BGP Outbound Route Filtering

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
October 7th, 2009

driymcg3h2

BGP Outbound Route Filtering

R1 and R2 are EBGP Neighbors. R1 is receiving the following routes from R2:

R1#sho ip bgp | be Net

Network          Next Hop            Metric LocPrf Weight Path

*> 200.0.0.0        192.168.12.2             0             0 200 i

*> 200.0.1.0        192.168.12.2             0             0 200 i

*> 200.0.2.0        192.168.12.2             0             0 200 i

*> 200.0.3.0        192.168.12.2             0             0 200 i
Read Full Entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , ,

Seting Route Tags with BGP table-map

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
June 1st, 2009

The table-map command is a lesser known and sometimes misunderstood BGP configuration command that can be used to set metrics or route-tags on routes. Here we use it to set a route-tag and verify that the tag stays after redistribution into OSPF.

R2 (AS #2) and R3 (AS #3) are BGP Peers. R3 and R4 are OSPF neighbors. R2 is advertising 192.168.12.0 and R3 is redistributing it into OSPF.


Read Full Entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , , ,

External BGP Links and Next Hop Self

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
January 5th, 2009

One of my students was talking to me today about BGP and various methods with which we can allow connectivity from within an IBGP cloud to external networks.

Generally speaking, for EBGP peering using the BGP standards, we peer based on the IP address of the BGP neighbors’ local interfaces. However, that brings up some challenging permutations. When peering is done via the external network of a BGP edge router within an AS, a BGP edge router will not change the next hop of for the route from the advertising AS when it receives it but rather will pass it on unchanged to its IBGP neighbors.

If the external network connecting the two AS’s is not advertised into the IGP of the receiving AS, the next hop of the route will presumably be unreachable.


Read Full Entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , , , ,

Why CCIE Service Provider???

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
November 7th, 2008

The Service Provider CCIE track offers a number of enticements to CCIE candidates. However, it is one of the most overlooked tracks, comprising only about 6% of CCIE numbers (about half as many as Security) and only 2% of R&S CCIEs undertake it successfully.

Looking at these numbers, I find that quite an oddity. Obviously, R&S is by far the most popular track and, like most people, it was the first that I undertook. By far the greatest intellectual achievement of my lifetime was obtaining my first CCIE. However, having done so like many people with the study bug, it is worth considering what to study next.


Read Full Entry »

Share and Enjoy:
  • RSS
  • Print
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • Slashdot
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • Blogplay
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Live
  • Ping.fm
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Tags: , , , , , ,