<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CCIE Voice 3.0 is here!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/</link>
	<description>CCIE Candidates blog for all technical overviews relating to CCIE R&#38;S, CCIE Voice, CCIE Security &#38; CCIE SP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:07:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Snow</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-323</guid>
		<description>Well - maybe its a change - and maybe the 4-port is just an add-on!
Maybe BR2 will have the 4-port and BR1 will continue to have a 16ESW. Or maybe not.
Who knows? Actually, historically, Cisco hasn&#039;t always given us all of the specific details on what NMs or VIC/HWIC cards have been installed, only on some of them. So it is still quite possible to see other (minor things) modules installed - such as leaving the 16 ESW in the mix.

But overall Chris - I agree with you - very strange indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; maybe its a change &#8211; and maybe the 4-port is just an add-on!<br />
Maybe BR2 will have the 4-port and BR1 will continue to have a 16ESW. Or maybe not.<br />
Who knows? Actually, historically, Cisco hasn&#8217;t always given us all of the specific details on what NMs or VIC/HWIC cards have been installed, only on some of them. So it is still quite possible to see other (minor things) modules installed &#8211; such as leaving the 16 ESW in the mix.</p>
<p>But overall Chris &#8211; I agree with you &#8211; very strange indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Snow</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3345</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Snow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-3345</guid>
		<description>Well - maybe its a change - and maybe the 4-port is just an add-on!
Maybe BR2 will have the 4-port and BR1 will continue to have a 16ESW. Or maybe not.
Who knows? Actually, historically, Cisco hasn&#039;t always given us all of the specific details on what NMs or VIC/HWIC cards have been installed, only on some of them. So it is still quite possible to see other (minor things) modules installed - such as leaving the 16 ESW in the mix.

But overall Chris - I agree with you - very strange indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well &#8211; maybe its a change &#8211; and maybe the 4-port is just an add-on!<br />
Maybe BR2 will have the 4-port and BR1 will continue to have a 16ESW. Or maybe not.<br />
Who knows? Actually, historically, Cisco hasn&#8217;t always given us all of the specific details on what NMs or VIC/HWIC cards have been installed, only on some of them. So it is still quite possible to see other (minor things) modules installed &#8211; such as leaving the 16 ESW in the mix.</p>
<p>But overall Chris &#8211; I agree with you &#8211; very strange indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kagadis</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kagadis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-322</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know why Cisco changed BR1 expansion module to the HWIC-4ESW-POE from the current 16 port version?  It&#039;s a curious change.

-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know why Cisco changed BR1 expansion module to the HWIC-4ESW-POE from the current 16 port version?  It&#8217;s a curious change.</p>
<p>-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Kagadis</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3344</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Kagadis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 05:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-3344</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know why Cisco changed BR1 expansion module to the HWIC-4ESW-POE from the current 16 port version?  It&#039;s a curious change.

-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know why Cisco changed BR1 expansion module to the HWIC-4ESW-POE from the current 16 port version?  It&#8217;s a curious change.</p>
<p>-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmalhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>vmalhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Jason- I happen to agree with Jonny on his point that you might want to consider starting to study on the new blueprint. Some people do pass on their first attempt but it is a rare thing. You ultimately have to decide but if I were in your shoes I would start studying for CCIE 3.0. Now if I had sat the lab once or twice already and had a few hundred hours of studying for the lab behind me then that would be different.

Our list of successes is ordered by CCIE #- looking down the list of CCIE successes can be somewhat misleading  as quite a few new CCIE-V&#039;s  already have passed R&amp;S and consequently they don&#039;t appear at the top of our list of successes due to their lower CCIE number. I would like this changed at some point.

I wish we have 10 new people per class since my bonus would be a lot better:-) We have some extremely busy phases and some very quiet times- I&#039;m not sure of all the factors that determine the trend.

Regarding students who attend bootcamps- its fairly easy for Mark and I to see who is prepared and who is not. There are quite a few people who use the bootcamp at the start of their preparation and use it to build a roadmap of what lies ahead. Some of these guys go on and pass 6 months to a year later (maybe we see them again on a free re-sit of the bootcamp). There are others who  get distracted by work and family commitments and we never see or hear from them again. We had a recent class of 12 people where 6 or 7 passed within the next couple of months. That was a good conversion rate. However there are some classes of 12 whereby it is a little more difficult to see more than a couple of people passing. But that is the nature of the exam- if everybody could pass the exam following a bootcamp then the certification would not have the prestige it presently carries.

Anyhow- best of luck to all reading this- it is no doubt a hard exam to pass. Cisco encourages study groups, use forums/email lists, use blogs, use workbooks, use bootcamps (subject to $$ being available). Don&#039;t study in isolation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason- I happen to agree with Jonny on his point that you might want to consider starting to study on the new blueprint. Some people do pass on their first attempt but it is a rare thing. You ultimately have to decide but if I were in your shoes I would start studying for CCIE 3.0. Now if I had sat the lab once or twice already and had a few hundred hours of studying for the lab behind me then that would be different.</p>
<p>Our list of successes is ordered by CCIE #- looking down the list of CCIE successes can be somewhat misleading  as quite a few new CCIE-V&#8217;s  already have passed R&amp;S and consequently they don&#8217;t appear at the top of our list of successes due to their lower CCIE number. I would like this changed at some point.</p>
<p>I wish we have 10 new people per class since my bonus would be a lot better:-) We have some extremely busy phases and some very quiet times- I&#8217;m not sure of all the factors that determine the trend.</p>
<p>Regarding students who attend bootcamps- its fairly easy for Mark and I to see who is prepared and who is not. There are quite a few people who use the bootcamp at the start of their preparation and use it to build a roadmap of what lies ahead. Some of these guys go on and pass 6 months to a year later (maybe we see them again on a free re-sit of the bootcamp). There are others who  get distracted by work and family commitments and we never see or hear from them again. We had a recent class of 12 people where 6 or 7 passed within the next couple of months. That was a good conversion rate. However there are some classes of 12 whereby it is a little more difficult to see more than a couple of people passing. But that is the nature of the exam- if everybody could pass the exam following a bootcamp then the certification would not have the prestige it presently carries.</p>
<p>Anyhow- best of luck to all reading this- it is no doubt a hard exam to pass. Cisco encourages study groups, use forums/email lists, use blogs, use workbooks, use bootcamps (subject to $$ being available). Don&#8217;t study in isolation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vmalhi</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3343</link>
		<dc:creator>vmalhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-3343</guid>
		<description>Jason- I happen to agree with Jonny on his point that you might want to consider starting to study on the new blueprint. Some people do pass on their first attempt but it is a rare thing. You ultimately have to decide but if I were in your shoes I would start studying for CCIE 3.0. Now if I had sat the lab once or twice already and had a few hundred hours of studying for the lab behind me then that would be different.

Our list of successes is ordered by CCIE #- looking down the list of CCIE successes can be somewhat misleading  as quite a few new CCIE-V&#039;s  already have passed R&amp;S and consequently they don&#039;t appear at the top of our list of successes due to their lower CCIE number. I would like this changed at some point.

I wish we have 10 new people per class since my bonus would be a lot better:-) We have some extremely busy phases and some very quiet times- I&#039;m not sure of all the factors that determine the trend.

Regarding students who attend bootcamps- its fairly easy for Mark and I to see who is prepared and who is not. There are quite a few people who use the bootcamp at the start of their preparation and use it to build a roadmap of what lies ahead. Some of these guys go on and pass 6 months to a year later (maybe we see them again on a free re-sit of the bootcamp). There are others who  get distracted by work and family commitments and we never see or hear from them again. We had a recent class of 12 people where 6 or 7 passed within the next couple of months. That was a good conversion rate. However there are some classes of 12 whereby it is a little more difficult to see more than a couple of people passing. But that is the nature of the exam- if everybody could pass the exam following a bootcamp then the certification would not have the prestige it presently carries.

Anyhow- best of luck to all reading this- it is no doubt a hard exam to pass. Cisco encourages study groups, use forums/email lists, use blogs, use workbooks, use bootcamps (subject to $$ being available). Don&#039;t study in isolation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason- I happen to agree with Jonny on his point that you might want to consider starting to study on the new blueprint. Some people do pass on their first attempt but it is a rare thing. You ultimately have to decide but if I were in your shoes I would start studying for CCIE 3.0. Now if I had sat the lab once or twice already and had a few hundred hours of studying for the lab behind me then that would be different.</p>
<p>Our list of successes is ordered by CCIE #- looking down the list of CCIE successes can be somewhat misleading  as quite a few new CCIE-V&#8217;s  already have passed R&amp;S and consequently they don&#8217;t appear at the top of our list of successes due to their lower CCIE number. I would like this changed at some point.</p>
<p>I wish we have 10 new people per class since my bonus would be a lot better:-) We have some extremely busy phases and some very quiet times- I&#8217;m not sure of all the factors that determine the trend.</p>
<p>Regarding students who attend bootcamps- its fairly easy for Mark and I to see who is prepared and who is not. There are quite a few people who use the bootcamp at the start of their preparation and use it to build a roadmap of what lies ahead. Some of these guys go on and pass 6 months to a year later (maybe we see them again on a free re-sit of the bootcamp). There are others who  get distracted by work and family commitments and we never see or hear from them again. We had a recent class of 12 people where 6 or 7 passed within the next couple of months. That was a good conversion rate. However there are some classes of 12 whereby it is a little more difficult to see more than a couple of people passing. But that is the nature of the exam- if everybody could pass the exam following a bootcamp then the certification would not have the prestige it presently carries.</p>
<p>Anyhow- best of luck to all reading this- it is no doubt a hard exam to pass. Cisco encourages study groups, use forums/email lists, use blogs, use workbooks, use bootcamps (subject to $$ being available). Don&#8217;t study in isolation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny J Vegas</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny J Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Jason

Very positive approach you are adopting. If you pass you will be one of less than 1% who make it first time.

Average number of attempts (according to a proctor) is &gt;5 for voice, this seems high but that is what I was told a couple of months ago.

I have come across some excellent folks on the bootcamp and they have take 3 or 4 attempts.

Of the 18 to 20 people whom I have come across on the bootcamps so far only a handful have passed and this is over the course of 12 months. If you look down the list of testimonials you will see who is passing voice. Now look at how many courses are run. About 10 new people per class.

IPExpert seems to generally be regarded as the best at voice and you can see the conversion rate is fairly small. It is very rare to just breeze through this thing. There are lots of bright people out there, if you could breeze it there would be a lot more than 857 voice CCIEs over the course of the 5 years it has been running.

I am all for positive thinking, just trying give folks a realistic view from the inside.

Also don&#039;t forget all the new kit, this is so much the place to be concentrating. Be right at the front of what can be done with the latest offerings. Better for you better for your company. Good luck what ever route you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason</p>
<p>Very positive approach you are adopting. If you pass you will be one of less than 1% who make it first time.</p>
<p>Average number of attempts (according to a proctor) is &gt;5 for voice, this seems high but that is what I was told a couple of months ago.</p>
<p>I have come across some excellent folks on the bootcamp and they have take 3 or 4 attempts.</p>
<p>Of the 18 to 20 people whom I have come across on the bootcamps so far only a handful have passed and this is over the course of 12 months. If you look down the list of testimonials you will see who is passing voice. Now look at how many courses are run. About 10 new people per class.</p>
<p>IPExpert seems to generally be regarded as the best at voice and you can see the conversion rate is fairly small. It is very rare to just breeze through this thing. There are lots of bright people out there, if you could breeze it there would be a lot more than 857 voice CCIEs over the course of the 5 years it has been running.</p>
<p>I am all for positive thinking, just trying give folks a realistic view from the inside.</p>
<p>Also don&#8217;t forget all the new kit, this is so much the place to be concentrating. Be right at the front of what can be done with the latest offerings. Better for you better for your company. Good luck what ever route you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny J Vegas</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny J Vegas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 14:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>Jason

Very positive approach you are adopting. If you pass you will be one of less than 1% who make it first time.

Average number of attempts (according to a proctor) is &gt;5 for voice, this seems high but that is what I was told a couple of months ago.

I have come across some excellent folks on the bootcamp and they have take 3 or 4 attempts.

Of the 18 to 20 people whom I have come across on the bootcamps so far only a handful have passed and this is over the course of 12 months. If you look down the list of testimonials you will see who is passing voice. Now look at how many courses are run. About 10 new people per class.

IPExpert seems to generally be regarded as the best at voice and you can see the conversion rate is fairly small. It is very rare to just breeze through this thing. There are lots of bright people out there, if you could breeze it there would be a lot more than 857 voice CCIEs over the course of the 5 years it has been running.

I am all for positive thinking, just trying give folks a realistic view from the inside.

Also don&#039;t forget all the new kit, this is so much the place to be concentrating. Be right at the front of what can be done with the latest offerings. Better for you better for your company. Good luck what ever route you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason</p>
<p>Very positive approach you are adopting. If you pass you will be one of less than 1% who make it first time.</p>
<p>Average number of attempts (according to a proctor) is &gt;5 for voice, this seems high but that is what I was told a couple of months ago.</p>
<p>I have come across some excellent folks on the bootcamp and they have take 3 or 4 attempts.</p>
<p>Of the 18 to 20 people whom I have come across on the bootcamps so far only a handful have passed and this is over the course of 12 months. If you look down the list of testimonials you will see who is passing voice. Now look at how many courses are run. About 10 new people per class.</p>
<p>IPExpert seems to generally be regarded as the best at voice and you can see the conversion rate is fairly small. It is very rare to just breeze through this thing. There are lots of bright people out there, if you could breeze it there would be a lot more than 857 voice CCIEs over the course of the 5 years it has been running.</p>
<p>I am all for positive thinking, just trying give folks a realistic view from the inside.</p>
<p>Also don&#8217;t forget all the new kit, this is so much the place to be concentrating. Be right at the front of what can be done with the latest offerings. Better for you better for your company. Good luck what ever route you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason L.</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-319</guid>
		<description>From any of your expirences, what does &quot;mid-July&quot; mean?  I have my first attempt at the Voice lab scheduled for July 07, 2008.  I&#039;ve read and agree with Johnny Vega&#039;s comment but I can&#039;t just sit back and wait for the new exam.  I know I have only one shot at the current lab so I&#039;m giving it my all.  My concern is that I have no idea what Cisco means by &quot;mid-July.&quot;  I would really be lost if I walked into the lab on July 7th and was handed the new lab.     Do you think July 7th would be considered &quot;mid-July&quot; to Cisco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From any of your expirences, what does &#8220;mid-July&#8221; mean?  I have my first attempt at the Voice lab scheduled for July 07, 2008.  I&#8217;ve read and agree with Johnny Vega&#8217;s comment but I can&#8217;t just sit back and wait for the new exam.  I know I have only one shot at the current lab so I&#8217;m giving it my all.  My concern is that I have no idea what Cisco means by &#8220;mid-July.&#8221;  I would really be lost if I walked into the lab on July 7th and was handed the new lab.     Do you think July 7th would be considered &#8220;mid-July&#8221; to Cisco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason L.</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/12/02/ccie-voice-3-blueprint/comment-page-1/#comment-3341</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=331#comment-3341</guid>
		<description>From any of your expirences, what does &quot;mid-July&quot; mean?  I have my first attempt at the Voice lab scheduled for July 07, 2008.  I&#039;ve read and agree with Johnny Vega&#039;s comment but I can&#039;t just sit back and wait for the new exam.  I know I have only one shot at the current lab so I&#039;m giving it my all.  My concern is that I have no idea what Cisco means by &quot;mid-July.&quot;  I would really be lost if I walked into the lab on July 7th and was handed the new lab.     Do you think July 7th would be considered &quot;mid-July&quot; to Cisco?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From any of your expirences, what does &#8220;mid-July&#8221; mean?  I have my first attempt at the Voice lab scheduled for July 07, 2008.  I&#8217;ve read and agree with Johnny Vega&#8217;s comment but I can&#8217;t just sit back and wait for the new exam.  I know I have only one shot at the current lab so I&#8217;m giving it my all.  My concern is that I have no idea what Cisco means by &#8220;mid-July.&#8221;  I would really be lost if I walked into the lab on July 7th and was handed the new lab.     Do you think July 7th would be considered &#8220;mid-July&#8221; to Cisco?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

