<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why CCIE Service Provider???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/</link>
	<description>CCIE Candidates blog for all technical overviews relating to CCIE R&#38;S, CCIE Voice, CCIE Security &#38; CCIE SP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 23:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: arun</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-224</guid>
		<description>hey seek your advice !!!

      I m a Telecomm Engineer ,woking on GSM technology ..., i believe that it not far that the convertional telcom has started looking at data network as cheaper ,effective transmission and switching medium and now that GSM started using partially or in other words GPRS on IP (GSM data works on IP network ) ... as this being the reality,more to this  voip and MPLS have already made their way into GSM . i am keen on the CCIE SP track (Service provider) i hope i not wrong ..... do have a least knowdge in IP networks ..... like nature of the protocal and the requirement to employee them  ... can u think it a best option to pursue SP .... as my First certification ...

  i did hear that CISCO has changed it CCIE lab Exam patron(addition of trouble shooting), is it limited to R&amp;S r the changes include Sp /Voice and etc.......


  plz help  i am keen on it .........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey seek your advice !!!</p>
<p>      I m a Telecomm Engineer ,woking on GSM technology &#8230;, i believe that it not far that the convertional telcom has started looking at data network as cheaper ,effective transmission and switching medium and now that GSM started using partially or in other words GPRS on IP (GSM data works on IP network ) &#8230; as this being the reality,more to this  voip and MPLS have already made their way into GSM . i am keen on the CCIE SP track (Service provider) i hope i not wrong &#8230;.. do have a least knowdge in IP networks &#8230;.. like nature of the protocal and the requirement to employee them  &#8230; can u think it a best option to pursue SP &#8230;. as my First certification &#8230;</p>
<p>  i did hear that CISCO has changed it CCIE lab Exam patron(addition of trouble shooting), is it limited to R&amp;S r the changes include Sp /Voice and etc&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>  plz help  i am keen on it &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arun</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-3230</link>
		<dc:creator>arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-3230</guid>
		<description>hey seek your advice !!!

      I m a Telecomm Engineer ,woking on GSM technology ..., i believe that it not far that the convertional telcom has started looking at data network as cheaper ,effective transmission and switching medium and now that GSM started using partially or in other words GPRS on IP (GSM data works on IP network ) ... as this being the reality,more to this  voip and MPLS have already made their way into GSM . i am keen on the CCIE SP track (Service provider) i hope i not wrong ..... do have a least knowdge in IP networks ..... like nature of the protocal and the requirement to employee them  ... can u think it a best option to pursue SP .... as my First certification ...

  i did hear that CISCO has changed it CCIE lab Exam patron(addition of trouble shooting), is it limited to R&amp;S r the changes include Sp /Voice and etc.......


  plz help  i am keen on it .........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey seek your advice !!!</p>
<p>      I m a Telecomm Engineer ,woking on GSM technology &#8230;, i believe that it not far that the convertional telcom has started looking at data network as cheaper ,effective transmission and switching medium and now that GSM started using partially or in other words GPRS on IP (GSM data works on IP network ) &#8230; as this being the reality,more to this  voip and MPLS have already made their way into GSM . i am keen on the CCIE SP track (Service provider) i hope i not wrong &#8230;.. do have a least knowdge in IP networks &#8230;.. like nature of the protocal and the requirement to employee them  &#8230; can u think it a best option to pursue SP &#8230;. as my First certification &#8230;</p>
<p>  i did hear that CISCO has changed it CCIE lab Exam patron(addition of trouble shooting), is it limited to R&amp;S r the changes include Sp /Voice and etc&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>  plz help  i am keen on it &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCIE</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>CCIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Thank you, this post really gave me a different perspective, and a push to continue on and get my second IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, this post really gave me a different perspective, and a push to continue on and get my second IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCIE</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-3225</link>
		<dc:creator>CCIE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-3225</guid>
		<description>Thank you, this post really gave me a different perspective, and a push to continue on and get my second IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, this post really gave me a different perspective, and a push to continue on and get my second IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinking of switching to SP &#171; CCIE Lab Preparation</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinking of switching to SP &#171; CCIE Lab Preparation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-218</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a good post on the IPexpert blog about doing SP after R&amp;S which makes sense to me. Im hoping that there isnt a major change in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a good post on the IPexpert blog about doing SP after R&amp;S which makes sense to me. Im hoping that there isnt a major change in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thinking of switching to SP &#171; CCIE Lab Preparation</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-3224</link>
		<dc:creator>Thinking of switching to SP &#171; CCIE Lab Preparation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-3224</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote a good post on the IPexpert blog about doing SP after R&amp;S which makes sense to me. Im hoping that there isnt a major change in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote a good post on the IPexpert blog about doing SP after R&amp;S which makes sense to me. Im hoping that there isnt a major change in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Faisal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-217</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

Its really nice to be on this forum, i need openion of you guys
i have CCNP and CCIP and now i am thinking which track i should go for first
R&amp;S or SP, which is good to have according to market demand.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>Its really nice to be on this forum, i need openion of you guys<br />
i have CCNP and CCIP and now i am thinking which track i should go for first<br />
R&amp;S or SP, which is good to have according to market demand.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faisal</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-3223</link>
		<dc:creator>Faisal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-3223</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

Its really nice to be on this forum, i need openion of you guys
i have CCNP and CCIP and now i am thinking which track i should go for first
R&amp;S or SP, which is good to have according to market demand.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>Its really nice to be on this forum, i need openion of you guys<br />
i have CCNP and CCIP and now i am thinking which track i should go for first<br />
R&amp;S or SP, which is good to have according to market demand.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zey</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Zey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Excellent experience sharing. I&#039;m planning for my SP lab exam next year. Enjoying every bits of BGP+MPLS knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent experience sharing. I&#8217;m planning for my SP lab exam next year. Enjoying every bits of BGP+MPLS knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zey</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/11/07/why-ccie-service-provider/comment-page-1/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator>Zey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=247#comment-3222</guid>
		<description>Excellent experience sharing. I&#039;m planning for my SP lab exam next year. Enjoying every bits of BGP+MPLS knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent experience sharing. I&#8217;m planning for my SP lab exam next year. Enjoying every bits of BGP+MPLS knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
