<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internetwork Expert&#039;s Major Announcements!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/</link>
	<description>CCIE Candidates blog for all technical overviews relating to CCIE R&#38;S, CCIE Voice, CCIE Security &#38; CCIE SP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 07:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brooks</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Moty,
Now that was an objective post! Thanks for the insight. It added much to the debate. :)
- Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moty,<br />
Now that was an objective post! Thanks for the insight. It added much to the debate. :)<br />
- Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brooks</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-3081</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:09:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-3081</guid>
		<description>Moty,
Now that was an objective post! Thanks for the insight. It added much to the debate. :)
- Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moty,<br />
Now that was an objective post! Thanks for the insight. It added much to the debate. :)<br />
- Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moty</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Moty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Matt, if you go up or down, right or left, on the earth or to the moon, IE is the best. No matter how far you go with this war they were and always will remain the best. May GOD have mercy on your soul. I never ever heard IE bashing IPEXPERT, nor Narbik, nor any vendor, on the contrary of that, i see every body else bashing them! why? if you wanna be successful like them go ahead, work hard and get it, but you wont win customers by bashing them, it will make you worse. Edit my post if you like but i took a snapshot of my post to prove how you are fair and honest (If you are!!) Worm regards Matt and Narbik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, if you go up or down, right or left, on the earth or to the moon, IE is the best. No matter how far you go with this war they were and always will remain the best. May GOD have mercy on your soul. I never ever heard IE bashing IPEXPERT, nor Narbik, nor any vendor, on the contrary of that, i see every body else bashing them! why? if you wanna be successful like them go ahead, work hard and get it, but you wont win customers by bashing them, it will make you worse. Edit my post if you like but i took a snapshot of my post to prove how you are fair and honest (If you are!!) Worm regards Matt and Narbik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moty</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-3080</link>
		<dc:creator>Moty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-3080</guid>
		<description>Matt, if you go up or down, right or left, on the earth or to the moon, IE is the best. No matter how far you go with this war they were and always will remain the best. May GOD have mercy on your soul. I never ever heard IE bashing IPEXPERT, nor Narbik, nor any vendor, on the contrary of that, i see every body else bashing them! why? if you wanna be successful like them go ahead, work hard and get it, but you wont win customers by bashing them, it will make you worse. Edit my post if you like but i took a snapshot of my post to prove how you are fair and honest (If you are!!) Worm regards Matt and Narbik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, if you go up or down, right or left, on the earth or to the moon, IE is the best. No matter how far you go with this war they were and always will remain the best. May GOD have mercy on your soul. I never ever heard IE bashing IPEXPERT, nor Narbik, nor any vendor, on the contrary of that, i see every body else bashing them! why? if you wanna be successful like them go ahead, work hard and get it, but you wont win customers by bashing them, it will make you worse. Edit my post if you like but i took a snapshot of my post to prove how you are fair and honest (If you are!!) Worm regards Matt and Narbik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilorah Nwachukwu</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilorah Nwachukwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-132</guid>
		<description>well,i am currently at my CCNP level, but i do read post on IPexpert and Internetworkexpert reqularly. first of all i beleive that the ventor product comparison should be left to candidate who use them rather than ventors spending time and trashing out error made by one another.


i do enjoy competition as long as it is healthy because it would give the ventors sleepless night and force them to come up with better ideas to improve the product and service the end user well.

my point is that ipexpert should encourage their instructors to write up post on topic , so that pple will get to know them . on a final NOTE IPEXPERT PRODUCT AND IE PRODUCT are good and they complement each other alot.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well,i am currently at my CCNP level, but i do read post on IPexpert and Internetworkexpert reqularly. first of all i beleive that the ventor product comparison should be left to candidate who use them rather than ventors spending time and trashing out error made by one another.</p>
<p>i do enjoy competition as long as it is healthy because it would give the ventors sleepless night and force them to come up with better ideas to improve the product and service the end user well.</p>
<p>my point is that ipexpert should encourage their instructors to write up post on topic , so that pple will get to know them . on a final NOTE IPEXPERT PRODUCT AND IE PRODUCT are good and they complement each other alot.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilorah Nwachukwu</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-3079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilorah Nwachukwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 07:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-3079</guid>
		<description>well,i am currently at my CCNP level, but i do read post on IPexpert and Internetworkexpert reqularly. first of all i beleive that the ventor product comparison should be left to candidate who use them rather than ventors spending time and trashing out error made by one another.


i do enjoy competition as long as it is healthy because it would give the ventors sleepless night and force them to come up with better ideas to improve the product and service the end user well.

my point is that ipexpert should encourage their instructors to write up post on topic , so that pple will get to know them . on a final NOTE IPEXPERT PRODUCT AND IE PRODUCT are good and they complement each other alot.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well,i am currently at my CCNP level, but i do read post on IPexpert and Internetworkexpert reqularly. first of all i beleive that the ventor product comparison should be left to candidate who use them rather than ventors spending time and trashing out error made by one another.</p>
<p>i do enjoy competition as long as it is healthy because it would give the ventors sleepless night and force them to come up with better ideas to improve the product and service the end user well.</p>
<p>my point is that ipexpert should encourage their instructors to write up post on topic , so that pple will get to know them . on a final NOTE IPEXPERT PRODUCT AND IE PRODUCT are good and they complement each other alot.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Chopra</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt-
In addition with my previous statement -
Today , I have used IE my primary resource and IPexpert as secondary for R&amp;S  but I have purchased all the products from both of them so tell me where is the loss? I am constantly refering both worbook and COD for my prepartion.  if I move to CCIE voice next year , I will reverse the primary and secondary path but the bottom line is that after netmasterclass stupid judgement (360 really suck!!!!!), only you and IE are available  who provide the self-placed training outside of America , I am from Asia and it is really easy for me to use your online products as a self-placed training resources.  It is also cheaper solution for us to purchase self-placed product and do study anytime from anywhere and it is only possible by you and IE so thanks both this renowned training companies.
Indeed , There is big market for both companies and I happy that your BLS is product is also equally worthwhile for purchase. Indeed , this is a real hard work to produce such type of products.
 IPexpert has still quality of trainers and Manpower that can make sure that IPexpert should be in successful in present and as well as in future.
Always remember, competition is always good.  My best wishes for both companies - Regards Amit Chopra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt-<br />
In addition with my previous statement -<br />
Today , I have used IE my primary resource and IPexpert as secondary for R&amp;S  but I have purchased all the products from both of them so tell me where is the loss? I am constantly refering both worbook and COD for my prepartion.  if I move to CCIE voice next year , I will reverse the primary and secondary path but the bottom line is that after netmasterclass stupid judgement (360 really suck!!!!!), only you and IE are available  who provide the self-placed training outside of America , I am from Asia and it is really easy for me to use your online products as a self-placed training resources.  It is also cheaper solution for us to purchase self-placed product and do study anytime from anywhere and it is only possible by you and IE so thanks both this renowned training companies.<br />
Indeed , There is big market for both companies and I happy that your BLS is product is also equally worthwhile for purchase. Indeed , this is a real hard work to produce such type of products.<br />
 IPexpert has still quality of trainers and Manpower that can make sure that IPexpert should be in successful in present and as well as in future.<br />
Always remember, competition is always good.  My best wishes for both companies &#8211; Regards Amit Chopra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Chopra</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-3078</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-3078</guid>
		<description>Hi Matt-
In addition with my previous statement -
Today , I have used IE my primary resource and IPexpert as secondary for R&amp;S  but I have purchased all the products from both of them so tell me where is the loss? I am constantly refering both worbook and COD for my prepartion.  if I move to CCIE voice next year , I will reverse the primary and secondary path but the bottom line is that after netmasterclass stupid judgement (360 really suck!!!!!), only you and IE are available  who provide the self-placed training outside of America , I am from Asia and it is really easy for me to use your online products as a self-placed training resources.  It is also cheaper solution for us to purchase self-placed product and do study anytime from anywhere and it is only possible by you and IE so thanks both this renowned training companies.
Indeed , There is big market for both companies and I happy that your BLS is product is also equally worthwhile for purchase. Indeed , this is a real hard work to produce such type of products.
 IPexpert has still quality of trainers and Manpower that can make sure that IPexpert should be in successful in present and as well as in future.
Always remember, competition is always good.  My best wishes for both companies - Regards Amit Chopra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt-<br />
In addition with my previous statement -<br />
Today , I have used IE my primary resource and IPexpert as secondary for R&amp;S  but I have purchased all the products from both of them so tell me where is the loss? I am constantly refering both worbook and COD for my prepartion.  if I move to CCIE voice next year , I will reverse the primary and secondary path but the bottom line is that after netmasterclass stupid judgement (360 really suck!!!!!), only you and IE are available  who provide the self-placed training outside of America , I am from Asia and it is really easy for me to use your online products as a self-placed training resources.  It is also cheaper solution for us to purchase self-placed product and do study anytime from anywhere and it is only possible by you and IE so thanks both this renowned training companies.<br />
Indeed , There is big market for both companies and I happy that your BLS is product is also equally worthwhile for purchase. Indeed , this is a real hard work to produce such type of products.<br />
 IPexpert has still quality of trainers and Manpower that can make sure that IPexpert should be in successful in present and as well as in future.<br />
Always remember, competition is always good.  My best wishes for both companies &#8211; Regards Amit Chopra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brooks</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-130</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Amit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Amit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Brooks</title>
		<link>http://blog.ipexpert.com/2008/10/31/ie_major_announcements/comment-page-2/#comment-3077</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ipexpert.ccieblog.com/?p=151#comment-3077</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments, Amit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments, Amit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

